Skip to content

Nobel Prize in literature: There will be a test

October 9, 2009
Herta Muller

Herta Muller

The stern if thoughtful folks in Stockholm have given us another homework assignment by selecting an obscure German novelist, Herta Muller, for this year’s Nobel Prize in Literature. Herta who?

Here’s where I’m supposed to throw out a lot of hastily gathered info on Muller to make it sound like, well, of course (!) I knew her work all along. Truth is, while I read as much as humanly possible, I had never heard of Muller before yesterday.

My ignorance could be evidence former Nobel permanent secretary Horace Engdahl was right when he said in 2008 that Americans are too parochial and self-obsessed, don’t read enough literature in translation, and besides, Europe is more cultured and produces better writers. So there.

Here, have some Jean-Marie Gustave Le Clezio (last year’s winner, from France)–he’s good for you, you stupid Americans!

Or it could be evidence, as Engdahl’s critics charged in the resulting controversy, that it’s Europeans who are parochial, resenting American dominance of popular and high culture, and besides, the Nobel committee tends to make selections on political and PR  considerations more than literary ones.

Can it be a coincidence that a novelist like Muller, who suffered under communism, is selected in the same year as the 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall? That’s the political angle. Plus, she can use the publicity more than famous contenders like Joyce Carol Oates, Philip Roth or Amos Oz. That’s the PR angle.

None of this should be held against Herta, a 56-year-old Romanian-born German writer who was censored and persecuted under the Communist dictatorship of Nicolae Ceausescu. Only a handful of her 20 novels are available in English, but that will doubtless change now that she’s won the Nobel, which comes with a $1.4 million cash award.

“In its citation, the Nobel committee wrote that Müller, ‘with the concentration of poetry and the frankness of prose, depicts the landscape of the dispossessed,'” reports the Los Angeles Times

Muller’s novels in translation — among them The Passport, The Appointment, The Land of the Green Plums — are “dark, closely observed and sometimes violent” works that explore exile and the “grim realities” of life under communism, according to The New York Times.

To learn more about Muller, who left Romania in 1987 after death threats greeted her refusal to become an informant for the government, start with the basic info at completereview.com. An excellent profile of Muller’s life and work is available from The Guardian.

Among the writers considered realistic candidates for this year’s prize, Muller was a 50-1 long shot. Most observers expected Israeli novelist Amos Oz to be selected. Americans Joyce Carole Oates and Philip Roth were also considered strong contenders. The last U.S. Nobel winner in literature, Toni Morrison, came in 1993.

Engdahl’s successor, Peter Englund worried just two days ago that the prize might be too “Eurocentric,” reports the Associated Press.

But after announcement of Muller’s selection, Engdahl said it was only natural Europeans most often win a prize that is, after all, selected by Europeans. “If you are European (it is) easier to relate to European literature,” he said.

Not all Europeans are thrilled about the Nobel’s “Eurocentrism.” Indeed, some seem downright embarrassed by it. German literary critic Marcel Reich-Ranicki, for example, refused to talk about Muller’s selection with The New York Times.

Another German critic, Helmuth Karasek, said Roth is long overdue for the prize, though he did praise Muller’s work, comparing her to Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, the Soviet-era dissident writer.

A third German critic, Thomas Steinfeld, went further: “Readers and literature critics will have to, until further notice, separate themselves from a much-loved notion: that the Nobel Prize for Literature is a reward for the best writer and the best works,” Steinfeld wrote on literature blog of Suddeutsche Zeitung, a leading newspaper. He added that Müller is “not a bad author. By no means.”

For her part, Muller seemed stunned by the award, clearly uncomfortable in a press conference, according to The New York Times. “I can’t even talk about it,” she said. “Somehow it’s too early. I think I need time to put it all in order.”

Meanwhile, Oz, Oates, Roth and any other disappointed contenders can console themselves in the knowledge that the eligible great writers of the past who didn’t win, either, includes Leo Tolstoy, Marcel Proust, Anton Chekhov, Thomas Hardy, Jorge Luis Borges, Mark Twain, Josef Conrad, James Joyce, Vladimir Nabokov, to name but a few.

Better company, I would say, than Dario Fo, Elfriede Jelinek, Pearl Buck, John Galsworthy, or Carl Gustaf Verner Von Heidenstam, cited in 1916 as “the leading representative of a new era in our literature.” There are some good writers in this list — and one supremely mediocre one — but on balance, not winning the Nobel Prize for Literature may be more of a distinction than winning the thing.

Except, of course, for the $1.4 million.

4 Comments leave one →
  1. October 9, 2009 1:29 pm

    Thanks, Chauncey, for your honest and insightful reportage. So who’s the mediocre one?

  2. Candice permalink
    October 9, 2009 9:09 pm

    Not read the book, but I am sure she is very deserving. As for the Eurocentric thing–we are probably all a little “centric” about the nation we call home. Nothing wrong with being proud of your own until you start hating everyone different.

  3. Chauncey Mabe permalink*
    October 12, 2009 11:12 am

    The “mediocre one” is….Pearl Buck.

  4. Love permalink
    October 12, 2009 8:35 pm

    FLORIDA BEST CHOICE: EARLY DEPARTURES FOR THE SUN

    Early Departures for the Sun, is a riveting book that chronicles the prevailing violence, which permeates our lives and homes. America has become so obsessed with violence that little children are learning to kill before they understand the English alphabet. Many people search for a spiritual answer, only to hope that their faiths would lead them to see their love ones who were violently removed from their lives. Violence also reared its ugly head in today’s foster care and adopted homes. In which the children that reside there are the victims of a terrible procedure that terminates parent’s parental rights by the thousands from data collected by corrupt Child Protective Service workers. America judicial system has failed our children and America cannot survive by giving its children an option of life in prison or death from gun violence. Early Departures for the Sun, gives honest reflections of how violence destroys the hearts and souls of people in marriages and relationships. The court dockets are replete with court dates from women and men who have filed personal protection orders against people who they once loved but now need protection from due to their violent and threatening behavior.
    The tragic events of today have impelled the author Raymond Sturgis to include poems that our hearts want to ask but our lifestyles actuate. Like the poems, “Where Is God? His Face, His Eyes, His Rage and Bullets In the Morning, that familiarize with unforgettable painful experiences. Author Raymond Sturgis also share his experiences of growing up and currently residing in Detroit, Michigan. The author conveys the sadness and despair of over 400 parents that have lost children to gun violence, robbing toddlers and infants of a chance of living a fulfilled life. The senseless act of violence is mainly from ex boyfriends, ex husbands or teenage cowards that found answers to their problems by shooting in homes and schools without remorse. Early Departures for the Sun gives a realistic view of how violent our world has become, but a more kinder and spiritual view of love ones taking the Early Departure to the Sun right outside heaven’s door. The author Raymond Sturgis understand that his book may intensify people anger towards the people that have killed their parents, brothers, sisters, friends or children. However, he reminds them in his chapter, “Is Violence All we Know?” that violence may lead to death, but death shall not be studied as a means to solve conflicts and misunderstandings. Early Departures for the Sun is a CALL OUT book, so that everyone can enlist in the war against violence, as well as an encouragement so we all can stand with those whom may have lost someone to violence. The book, Early Departures for the Sun is available through Amazon.com, http://www.bubooksontheweb.com, Borders, Walden Books, and hundreds of media outlets around the world.

    Paperback: 390 pages
    Publisher: Infinity Publishing (August 21, 2009)
    Language: English
    ISBN-10: 0741453177

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: